Why My Children Are Such Good Investors

Published in Investing on 19 September 2011

Do you invest for your kids? If so, does their return beat yours?

My two daughters' investment returns continually beat my own hands down.

During the summer sell off, they lost only about 5% despite being fully invested at the start of July.

They first started investing in earnest following a bit of a windfall when the eldest one was selected for a Persil TV ad in 2006. They've managed to almost triple the money earned back then. They'll both need the money in less than a decade if they decide to go on to higher education, so it's good that the fund is doing so well.

So how do they achieve this kind of return?

Overall strategy

It's quite straightforward really; they buy conspicuous value and are patient. They don't overtrade. They buy for yield, as well as value, and don't get their heads turned by exciting small caps on the verge of a big future that never comes to pass.

They're content not to buy at the absolute bottom, nor to try and time the absolute top. And they take the profit when the clear value has been outed. They diversify well, but hold sufficiently few shares that it's not impossible to whip the market.

They never buy shares where one person or a couple of people acting in concert have complete control. But they do like the directors to have a meaningful stake in the business.

And they aren't afraid to take a loss on the chin, when an investment story doesn't pan out as well as anticipated.

For such a simple and relatively boring strategy, the returns are amazing. But there are times when they're quite bold. And they aren't scared of investing in very small caps and AIM-listed companies when there's clear value to be had, even in the absence of dividends.

Examples

For example, the biggest single gain came last year with Nautical Petroleum (LSE: NPE), buying around the 40p mark, and selling after it quadrupled (much too early as it turned out).  

A good example of a big cap trade was Royal Dutch Shell (LSE: RDSB) which they bought into in the summer of 2010.  At this time, Shell shares were adversely affected by an unfair "read across" from BP's Gulf of Mexico disaster.

They bought the shares in July at £15.70, exiting in January at £21.30 and picking up over 50p in dividends along the way.

A recent mistake, so far anyway, was to go into Sainsbury (LSE: SBRY) around £3 -- a little too early as it turned out. I suspect it won't be too long before they're in profit, but even if not, the shares should return 80% or so over the next decade via compounding the dividends.

They aren't perfect investors by any means. They make mistakes as we all do. They're just a lot better than me.

Of course, they're blissfully unaware of how well they're doing and are content with a fiver a week each in pocket money for the time being.

The moral of this story

The point is; their returns are better than mine because I make shrewder, more balanced decisions on their behalves than I do for myself. The tortoise generally does beat the hare.  

So what's the moral of this story? Well for me, it's that I should invest on my own behalf as carefully as I do for my daughters.

The problem is that it's easy to give yourself this kind of advice when markets are as bearish as they've been of late.

When you're making money hand over fist, it's harder to be as disciplined. Nevertheless, I resolve henceforth to invest as carefully on my own behalf as I do for the girls.

Six point checklist

I may need a hypnotist to make a reality out of this resolution. But a checklist should help. This will be pinned to my computer and tattooed onto the back of my hand, as follows:

1. Invest with a ten-year horizon.

2. If in any doubt, leave it completely out!

3. Invest mainly for income, whilst simultaneously investing for value.

4. Look for a margin of safety.

5. Be patient -- resist the urge to do something.

6. Listen to ideas, use others' analysis, but be completely independently minded; trust your instincts, whilst also trying to take the emotion out of decisions.

More from David Holding:

> David owns shares in Royal Dutch Shell and Sainsbury.

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

goodlifer 19 Sep 2011 , 1:15pm

Brilliant article.

Remember Great-Uncle Ben's closing words?

He says it's easier than it looks to get satisfactory results from your investments, but to get superior ones is more difficult than most people realise.

cou 19 Sep 2011 , 1:48pm

I find the same.. my wife's portfolio is beating mine, having much more boring shares in it.

snoekie 19 Sep 2011 , 5:08pm

Good article, but then the grass is always greener............!

Excel35 19 Sep 2011 , 8:12pm

Why is it a mistake to have bought Sainsbury's at £3? Just because it has since traded lower does not mean it was a mistake if they/you are holding for the long term.

spyknife 20 Sep 2011 , 10:49pm

Where the hell did your kids find out about nautical petroleum ?
I am a full time investor and Ive never heard of them until today.
What did your kids buy this summer ? With all the recent bargains out there its hard to believe they didnt invest in them.

pagain 21 Sep 2011 , 4:56pm


Well, spyknife, there were a couple of good articles on the Motley Fool in 2009 and April 2010 by a guy called David Holding.

They worked for me. Thanks to the author.

Join the conversation

Please take note - some tags have changed.

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: [b]bolded text[/b], [i]italicised text[/i]. All other tags will be removed from your post.

If you want to add a link, please ensure you type it as http://www.fool.co.uk as opposed to www.fool.co.uk.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.