3 Recessions In The Next Decade

Published in Investing on 23 December 2011

That's what Deutsche Bank reckon. But are they right?

I mentioned previously that I was planning on catching up on some investment-related reading over the Christmas break. And close to the top of the list was a study from Deutsche Bank that came out in early September: Long Term Asset Return Study: a Roadmap for the Grey Age.

The urgency was given added impetus by an e-mail in my in-box from Howard Archer, chief economist at IHS Global Insight. Commenting on Thursday's modest upwards revision of the GDP estimate for the third quarter of the year, Dr Archer said this:

"The economy is clearly now finding it very difficult to grow at all in the face of serious domestic and global headwinds... we expect economic activity to be essentially flat in the fourth quarter, and modest contraction in the early months of 2012, before the economy stabilizes and returns to gradual growth in the second half of 2012."

Double dip

That's right: economic contraction in the first quarter of next year, 2012.

Now technically, of course, that might not officially count as a 'recession' -- for it to be an official recession, two (or more) quarters of economic contraction are required.

But irrespective of that, I suspect that it will feel like a recession.

And in any case, the fourth quarter of this year -- essentially flat, as Dr Archer puts it -- could turn out negative, too. In which case, it's an official recession, as well as a contraction that feels like one.

Early warning

Back in early September, when Deutsche Bank published its report, the authors kicked off with an assertion that to me seemed somewhat unlikely at the time.

Namely, that we would see a recession in 2012 -- and an 'official' one, at that. That seems remarkably prescient, seeing that the document would have been penned in July and August.

What's more, the authors bluntly assert that we will see two more follow it: one in or around 2016, and another in or around 2020.

Shorter cycles

How come? It's part of a move to shorter business cycles, in short, a development that is driven by low demand, debt, and funding crises.

Indeed, while the authors make the point that business cycles over the next decade will be shorter than is historically normal over the 157 year period that they studied, they also point out that the longer-than-average periods of economic expansion seen post-war have been something of an anomaly.

"The full 157 year period has seen an average expansion of 39 months (30 median) and an average contraction of 17 months (14 median). Based on these averages the first recession of this decade could start somewhere between December of this year and August of next year (2012)," they write.

Subsequent recessions could occur between 2015‑2017, and then between 2019‑2021, they add, noting that "It's quite easy to construct an argument for three recessions in the next decade as we revert to normality."

What does this mean for investors?

This is serious -- and sobering -- stuff. And you don't have to be a genius to see that three recessions in the next decade could upset an awful lot of assumptions about stock market growth, retirement savings and wealth accumulation.

Or, as the Deutsche Bank authors put it:

"Overall, the next decade will likely be one where buy and hold will generally be a fairly poor option in developed markets. Identifying the turns in the business cycle will likely see the best chance of out‑performance. There will be large cyclical rallies punctuated by recessions and funding crises."

Oh dear. Interesting times, indeed.

But there is hope. It's a decade of shorter-than-usual business cycles as the global economy works off excessive debt and over-inflated asset prices.

After that, normality returns -- although a less affluent normality than that of the last few post-war decades.

Festive cheer? Sadly not. But certainly something to chew over. What do you think?

> The Fool's latest report has just been published! Make sure you don't miss '10 Steps to Making a Million' -- it's free!

More from Malcolm Wheatley:

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

BarrenFluffit 23 Dec 2011 , 2:07pm

So Deutsche Bank are not advocating buy and hold and are advocating their clients trade...

HenryG33 23 Dec 2011 , 2:37pm

So a bank has carried out research which suggests that investors should trade more frequently over the next decade. Thereby increasing revenue for the bank through fees. Well its one solution to their debt problems.

Fellow fools do not buy in to this propaganda!!!

BigJC1 23 Dec 2011 , 2:49pm

That would be the same Deutsche Bank that built up a huge exposure to the PIIGS ?

If they didn't see that one coming in their crystal ball (and all the figures were out there to analyse, and plenty of people warned them about the folly of the euro project) why do we believe them this time?

Why do people keep reporting these works of fiction as facts ? The actual fact is that nobody knows, it's just that they are paid massive salaries to dream up this drivel and therefore have to justify their existence by publishing, knowing that by 2016 we will have moved on. I can kind of remember some important bloke in the distant past forecasting "no more boom or bust" and everyone believing that.

Happy Christmas, here's hoping that 2012 proves them all wrong.

VinoDiony 23 Dec 2011 , 3:02pm

So, let me get this right, DB wants us to accurately predict the dips and buy and then predict the apexes to sell and continue with this winning formula for the next decade? Wow – truly amazing! I had no idea these investment bankers were so clever...!

Still, I am old fashioned and hence LTBH will work fine for me, thank you. I’d rather suffer the sin of omission than the sin of commission...sorry, no pun intended!! :-)

goodlifer 23 Dec 2011 , 8:38pm

"Festive cheer? Sadly not."

Could you hope for anything better?

If DB's got it right - fat chance! - there'll be lots of opportunity to buy good stuff at sensible prices and sell opportunistically if Mr Market gets greedy.

ANuvver 24 Dec 2011 , 1:21pm

So DB is inviting us all to dance, eh?

It is indeed a trader's market and likely to remain so for the near future. But that doesn't mean you have to trade. In fact, it means vigilance, discipline and a long-term bottom-up approach can, um, pay dividends...

A year for watchlists, methinks. I have a few ideas bubbling away and if I act on two or three of them during 2012, I'll count it a good year.

Best wishes to all.

pickepics 28 Dec 2011 , 8:04pm

Exactly 3 recessions? Over a specific 10 year period? I'd like to know if they can get the next few months right first thank you. As BigJC1 notes, they are hardly renowned for their predictive accuracies.

RobinnBanks 29 Dec 2011 , 1:57am

GB did abolish boom and bust: he turned it into consistent bust!

Join the conversation

Please take note - some tags have changed.

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: [b]bolded text[/b], [i]italicised text[/i]. All other tags will be removed from your post.

If you want to add a link, please ensure you type it as http://www.fool.co.uk as opposed to www.fool.co.uk.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.