Why Are The Banks Doing So Well?

Published in Investing on 9 March 2012

British banks have had a surprisingly good three months.

Remember the end of 2011? It was all doom and gloom. The year had been a torrid one for shares, and most particularly banking shares. And the pundits were predicting more of the same for 2012.

Banking shares had looked cheap in 2011, but they just kept getting cheaper. Many investors, including myself, got hurt trying to catch these extra sharp falling knives.

2011 was a terrible year for banks

The banks were suffering as the eurozone debt crisis rolled on through 2011, going from one disaster to another. First Greece, then Portugal, then Italy -- this seemed to be the crisis without end. With the prospect of billions of pounds of debt defaults, banks were the last thing to be invested in.

What's more, many banks had not recovered from the Credit Crunch of 2008 and their finances were still in a parlous state, with mountains of bad debt on their balance sheets.

And then there was the opacity of their accounts. Bank finances are a minefield of arcane terminology, from credit default swaps and core tier 1 capital to Libor and loan-to-deposit ratios. I'll be honest and say that I don't understand much of this, and I suspect most Motley Fool readers don't either.

This complexity was not only putting investors off -- in the words of Warren Buffett, "Never invest in a business you cannot understand" -- it was also making the banks very difficult to value.

Capitulation, followed by recovery

So bank share prices kept falling. By December, virtually everyone seemed to have given up on the banks. I certainly wasn't even bothering to check their share prices -- it was a capitulation point.

But since then, we have seen a remarkable recovery. Lloyds Banking Group (LSE: LLOY) is currently up 56% from its 2011 low, Royal Bank of Scotland (LSE: RBS) is up 51%, and Barclays (LSE: BARC) is up a whopping 73%. What on earth is going on?

Well, it is down to just one thing: the prospect of Armageddon in the eurozone, which was looming over everything in 2011, has dramatically receded. For that, we have to thank the ECB and its head, (Super) Mario Draghi. The Long Term Refinancing Operation (LTRO) has pushed down eurozone bond yields and has, quite simply, saved the day.

But there is still a long road ahead

However, this doesn't mean that the prospects for Britain's banks are going to suddenly improve. It is just saying that absolute disaster is now off the table. And that has been enough for the recovery in share prices.

But let's not delude ourselves. Last month, Lloyds reported a £2 billion loss for 2011. And RBS also posted a £2 billion loss, up from the £1.1 billion loss of 2010. Clearly, even though the immediate possibility of another major banking disaster has receded, it is still going to take a long time, and a lot of hard work, to clean up the mess after the Credit Crunch.

A worthwhile contrarian investment

Which leads us to the big question. Are the banks still worth investing in? Well, all three banks that I have mentioned still look cheap relative to their asset value. Lloyds is on a discount to net tangible asset value of 41%, RBS's discount is 50% and even Barclays is on a discount of 35%.

In the long term, I think these discounts will narrow. However, the road to recovery will not be a smooth one -- I suspect there will be more ups and downs to come.

Nonetheless, I would say the banks are a worthwhile contrarian investment for the patient, and for those with a stomach for fluctuations. If you count yourself as one of these, then by all means buy in. If not, then there are many other bargains available in today's stock market.

> Get the latest on investing and the markets, direct from the desk of David Kuo. You'll also receive a special free report on '10 Steps To Making A Million' if you join The Motley Fool Collective today.

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

DennisDenuto 09 Mar 2012 , 2:33pm

Mcecaro I find Santander a real conundrum. I love the Latin American assets, in the next twenty years shareholder will, IMO, be reaping the rewards of these assets.

As a group they also did brilliantly during the financial crisis post Lehmans in buying mature assets at a discount price. However, I have no idea how much they are leveraged to Spain from a financial perspective and on a more general note I hate the overall Botin family cronyism/ hold on the business.

Graham01 12 Mar 2012 , 1:18pm

I have done very well from Barclays over the last 8-9 months. I started pound-cost-averaging each month thinking the shares looked cheap (and were going to stay cheap) at £2.65. After a few months at that price they plummeted down to around £1.40 or so but I kept going. Average price now is about £2.04 with a dividend being paid on Friday. So far so good but I'm in for the long haul.

A good lesson for me in not being able to time the market and spreading the risk. That said I'm only willing to do this for stocks that look like they are going to stay cheap for a while.

Benatar 12 Mar 2012 , 5:32pm

I received my annual report for M&G Recovery Fund on Friday. as the name suggests the fund looks to invests on businesses which have fallen on hard times, and are turing the corner. In the last 12 months or so, Banks must have been on thier radar. The report said, "Despite a long period of underperformance, we maintain our cautious stance on Banks. Their business remains dificult to understand, we struggle to find management teams we can trust, and we continue to find better ideas in other areas."

The fund has been going for over 40 years, out performs the FTSE 100 and All share Index over almost any period you look at, and hit their al time high last month - they have a good record.

Benatar 12 Mar 2012 , 5:34pm

"This complexity was not only putting investors off -- in the words of Warren Buffett, "Never invest in a business you cannot understand" -- it was also making the banks very difficult to value."

This is the main reason I am not investing in banks despite their apparently cheap price.

Interestingly Buffett does own shares in Banks - obviouisly he thinks he understands them.

Join the conversation

Please take note - some tags have changed.

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: [b]bolded text[/b], [i]italicised text[/i]. All other tags will be removed from your post.

If you want to add a link, please ensure you type it as http://www.fool.co.uk as opposed to www.fool.co.uk.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.