12 FTSE 100 Shares Set To Rise Steeply

Published in Investing on 6 July 2012

If politics keeps driving this market rally, then these dozen stocks could do well.

After several months of weakness, the London stock market is showing some recent strength.

As I write, the blue-chip FTSE 100 (UKX) index of elite UK-listed companies has risen by roughly 160 points since 28 June, which is an uplift of about 3% in seven trading days. This rise came about following an unusually successful euro-summit offering real concessions to struggling Italy, Spain and Ireland.

Central banks act

Nevertheless, growth in the UK and euro zone has been weak of late, so central banks once again rode to the rescue.

On Thursday, the European Central Bank (ECB) cut its main interest rate to 0.75% from 1% -- the lowest level since the ECB was established in 1998. Clearly, the ECB is pinning its hopes on lower borrowing costs leading to increased spending by individuals and higher investment by companies.

Here in Blighty, the Bank of England has less room to manoeuvre, having already cut its base rate to a mere 0.5%, the lowest level in the Bank's 318-year history. Thus, also on Thursday, the Bank revealed 'QE3' -- its third round of quantitative easing (QE), often dubbed 'money printing'.

On top of the £325 billion pumped into the economy by QE1 and QE2, the Bank has added another £50 billion in the form of QE3. Banks benefit greatly from QE, as it improves their liquidity and lowers their funding costs. Alas, QE harms pensioners by lowering annuity rates and may also push up inflation by increasing the money supply.

Another relief rally?

When the Bank launched QE1 and QE2, share prices rallied strongly for months afterwards. Hence, if QE3 gets a similar reception, then the London market may continue to build on its recent upswing.

However, which shares are likely to do best in steadily rising markets? The answer could be shares with 'high betas'.

Beta is a measure of an asset's volatility, relative to its wider market. For instance, a beta of below one means that a share is less volatile than the wider market. Similarly, a beta above one means a share tends to move up and down with greater volatility than its peers.

Therefore, shares with high betas tend to rise more quickly during market upswings, but dive more steeply when Mr Market is feeling gloomy.

Twelve high-beta Footsie shares

To find out more about blue-chip betas, I screened the FTSE 100 to find high-beta candidates. I found:

  • 53 shares with a beta of one or more;
  • 24 shares with a beta of at least 1.5; and
  • 12 shares with a beta of 1.8 and above.

Hence, I'm going to take a look at the fundamentals of these 12 highest-beta candidates to see which stick out as potential bargains. Here are these 'dynamic dozen' stocks, sorted from lowest to highest beta:

CompanyPrice (p)Market value (£bn)BetaPERDividend yieldDividend cover
Fresnillo (LSE: FRES)1,48310.81.820.62.5%1.9
IMI (LSE: IMI)8392.71.810.03.9%2.6
Aviva (LSE: AV)
Rio Tinto (LSE: RIO)3,064.544.
Eurasian Natural Resources (LSE: ENRC)420.
Xstrata (LSE: XTA)833.
Lloyds Banking Group (LSE: LLOY)30.2521.
Royal Bank of Scotland (LSE: RBS)20212.
Antofagasta (LSE: ANTO)1,11311.
Barclays (LSE: BARC)164.5520.
Kazakhmys (LSE: KAZ)7304.
Vedanta Resources (LSE: VED)913.

Unsurprisingly, this table of high-beta shares lists companies with high recovery potential if and when the UK and global economies improve. It contains seven mining firms, three banks, one insurer (Aviva) and one engineer (IMI).

For today's exercise, I will not simply single out those shares with the highest betas. After all, if the market goes into reverse, then these stocks should suffer most. Hence, I will choose five stocks which have both high betas and value characteristics to protect investors' potential downside.

Five big names to watch

I tend to avoid companies with double-digit PERs (price-earnings ratios), which eliminates four firms. Also, I will reject RBS, because of its lack of a dividend, plus Rio Tinto and Xstrata, as their dividend yields (both 3.3%) are below the market average.

This leaves the following five high-beta shares with value features (in A-Z order):

1. Aviva (beta of 1.8)

On a forward PER of 5.4 and a prospective dividend yield approaching 10%, Aviva certainly looks cheap as chips to me. Also, it's just announced a major restructuring aimed at improving its returns on capital. This is surely a share for dividend devotees and deep-value diggers.

2. ENRC (beta of 2.0)

This is a very racy stock and, therefore, not one for widows and orphans to pile up. I say this because ENRC operates in the 'Wild East' of mining (in former Soviet states) and has had more than its fair share of corporate-governance run-ins. With a PER of six and dividend yield of 3.6%, it trades at 'danger money' levels, but this rating has room for future improvement.

3. Barclays (beta of 2.4)

Barclays, its management and share price has been under the cosh since last week, when it admitted to manipulating Libor. If you think this news has harmed the bank's business model as badly as it has hit its reputation, then you should steer well clear of Barclays.

Then again, if you think a PER of 5.8 and dividend yield of 4.2% sound appealing, then you may be able to look beyond recent events and play the long game by buying into a battered Barclays.

4. Kazakhmys (beta of 2.4)

Being in the same sector and ex-Soviet geography as ENRC, Kazakhmys comes with similar warnings. Even so, it trades on a PER of 5.4 and offers a modest dividend of 2.5%, making it the lowest-yielding of my five high-beta firms. In fact, I would have left out Kaz on dividend grounds, had it not been for its very high dividend cover (a whopping 7.4 times) offering high upside for increased cash payouts.

5. Vedanta (beta of 2.6)

Lastly, another miner, this time Indian giant Vedanta, a leading producer of copper, zinc, aluminium and iron ore with interests in the energy market.

Vedanta was once my largest-ever shareholding, so I can vouch for its volatility. In the time I owned it, Vedanta's share price went from £10 to £27, before later collapsing to below £4 and then back up to £30! Right now, this Indian jewel trades on an ultra-low PER of 4.7 and offers a prospective dividend yield of 3.9%.

What next?

Of course, what remains to be seen is if the recent market rally has legs and will continue, or whether it will run out of steam and stumble before reversing. For the answer to this particular riddle -- as always -- please consult your crystal ball!

Finally, which sectors should you favour in this topsy-turvy market? To find out, read Three Top Sectors For 2012. In this free report, we identify a trio of stock-market sectors that combine decent dividends with superior growth. One may be the market's most boring sector, but has produced superior returns for investors for 20 years.

To find out more about these three sexy sectors, please download your free copy of this report today!

More from Cliff D'Arcy:

> Cliff does not own any of the shares mentioned in this article.

Share & subscribe


The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

F958B 06 Jul 2012 , 5:56pm

It needs the Federal Reserve to "do something" in order to move those shares.

If QE is forthcoming from the Fed, I expect most of those shares to really perform. Probably silver bullion would go ballistic.

I'm very surprised that the Fed hasn't done so already. It's almost as if the Fed wants to dash Obama's chances of re-election.
It might also be that they're trying to crush speculators out of "inflation-hedge" commodities such as oil, in order to bring inflation down in advance of another big dose of QE.

With the Fed having been a little outspoken on the subject of the US government not doing much to deal with the deficit, I'm also beginning to wonder whether the Fed are now attempting to force the matter by attempting to lose the election for Obama, in the hope that the Republicans will be more proactive in dealing with the deficit.

Rotation96 06 Jul 2012 , 10:19pm

I've been thinking for a while about using the continuous 'risk on/risk off' coin flip of macro economic news more widely with several companies on this list, the only time I've actually done it I made about 12% on ENRC. It's not a particularly 'Foolish' thing to do, but has anyone got any thoughts on this because it seems like there are going to be plenty more opportunities?

I personally have no idea why institutional investors pay so much attention to economic data in the first place. It's well documented that economic growth has almost zero correlation with share price performance. Any ideas as to why institutional investors bolt one way or the other based on factors such as American unemployment?

1 other question - what's the deal with the weak yields on the miners? ENRC is covered over 5 times (and they cut their divi) and Vedanta is covered more than 9 times, yet the yields compared to P/E for the sector in general are very low. Is this historically the case within the sector?

F958B 07 Jul 2012 , 12:06am

Miners tend to operate with higher dividend cover because their earnings are very variable depending on metals prices.

In recent years, the commodity boom seems to be encouraging miners to go on a huge building and acquisition spree, rather reminiscent of the telecoms bubble of 1999-2000. The "shock" of the commodity price collapse in 2008-9 which caused their dividend payouts to be cancelled and a few "emergency" rights issues, has tempted many miners to pay-down some of their debt too.
This aggressive mining expansion is being partly funded by retaining earnings and therefore less is available to be paid-out to shareholders.

In the medium term, I expect a lot of overcapacity in the sector and a lot of large write-downs of all the money currently being splashed on grand schemes. In a few years time, hindsight will probably show that miners should have looked after their shareholders with a bit more in the way of dividends and a bit less on projects which end up unprofitable.

Rotation96 06 Jul 2012 , 11:28pm

Thanks f9, that makes a lot of sense, very helpful

ANuvver 07 Jul 2012 , 6:04pm


I know what you mean - it's very tempting to try to play this kind of market, isn't it? Some have even suggested it's the only way to make decent returns for the foreseeable - I disagree.

Hindsight being what it is, getting brave towards 5 and nervous towards 6 would have done very well for you this past year.

I would suggest that if you want to try this, it would be more cost/tax efficient to go the spreadbetting route. Set aside a loseable kitty for this purpose, then "ringfence" that side of your activity totally from your usual investment activities.

Personally, I'd rather play half this game, with a long view. Some will argue that market timing is an unFoolish activity - but then you read scores of articles here discussing shares that might be trading at bargain valuations. Which is market timing.

I agree with F that the nick-of-time arrival of Officer Bernanke's Federal Cavalry is the key. Failing that, I think the market at large saw last week's stimulus measures coming a mile off and it might now be a little late to jump on this particular ride.

Further to the point F makes about mining overcapacity, let's not forget the great wadges of copper held in bonded warehouses by Chinese firms for use as collateral. As a result, Dr Copper may be not quite the timelord genius he once was...

goodlifer 07 Jul 2012 , 11:59pm

Rio Tinto (LSE: RIO) 3,064.5 44.5 2.0 7.0 3.3% 4.3

Also, I will reject RBS, because of its lack of a dividend, plus Rio Tinto and Xstrata, as their dividend yields (both 3.3%) are below the market average.

goodlifer 08 Jul 2012 , 12:07am

Please ignore unedited, accidentally posted rubbisht above.

I think RiIO might be a pretty good buy, perhaps a very good one..
I agree it'd be nice to have a higher divvy
But it's covered pretty generously.

And a PER of 7 plus a beta of 2 makes it look a reasonably good long term bargain..

brokerjohn 09 Jul 2012 , 2:20pm

If one looks, nearly all are performing less well than the FTSE All Share Index.

AChembi 10 Jul 2012 , 6:59am

Hi brokerjohn
The past 5 years FTSE ALL Share Index could not match LSE:DGO , LSE:TLW and LSE:PAF
Fact and figures speak out and undeniable.

Join the conversation

Please take note - some tags have changed.

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: [b]bolded text[/b], [i]italicised text[/i]. All other tags will be removed from your post.

If you want to add a link, please ensure you type it as http://www.fool.co.uk as opposed to www.fool.co.uk.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.