Lloyds Banking "Stitched Up" As Co-Op Buys Bargain Branches

Published in Company Comment on 23 July 2012

EU rules provide another reasons to avoid the sector.

Shareholders in Lloyds Banking (LSE: LLOY), the company that was formed in 2009 when Lloyds TSB ruined itself by buying HBOS, were kicked in the teeth last week after the Co-operative Bank bought 632 of its branches in a deal worth up to £750 million.

In a stroke, the Co-operative Bank has dramatically expanded its existing branch network, thus increasing its economies of scale, and it has done so at a bargain price. Lloyds, on the other hand, has been royally stitched up as it was forced to sell to the authorities' preferred bidder in spite of there being more lucrative offers on the table.

Three negatives for Lloyds

Lloyds was forced by the European Union to sell these 'Project Verde' branches because the EU felt that the bank's market share was too large. Oddly enough the EU was happy for the original deal to buy HBOS to go ahead when it could have easily vetoed it for the same reason.

Lloyds has also been forced to accept a much lower price than was offered by other bidders and it has had to guarantee the £350 million of debt that the Co-operative Bank is issuing to pay for the first instalment.

So Lloyds is effectively lending money to the Co-operative Bank, which it will then use to buy the Project Verde branches. That isn't exactly what you'd call a good deal.

People will come

The Co-operative Bank's profile has risen strongly during the last few months as many people have moved their accounts from those larger rivals embroiled in yet another wave of scandals.

A good example prompting people to shift to the Co-operative Bank was the computer problems that recently hit Royal Bank of Scotland (LSE: RBS), where NatWest, RBS and Ulster Bank customers were unable to access their money for a couple of weeks. Applications for accounts with the Co-operative Bank have risen by about a quarter since this news hit the wires.

To say the banking industry has a public-relations problem is a mild understatement. The Co-operative, helped by its ethical image and not having to be bailed out by the government in 2008-09, is well placed to capitalise upon its competitors' misfortunes.

Oils, Pharmaceuticals, Telecoms, Banks? -- Where should you invest in today's uncertain times? "Top Sectors Of 2012" is the Motley Fool's latest guide to help Britain invest. Better. Why not try this free report?

Investing in the Co-operative

If you were thinking of buying shares in the Co-operative Bank you're out of luck. That's because it's owned by the Co-operative Group; a mutual organisation that is in turn owned by its six million or so members, which include depositors at the Britannia Building Society and people who regularly shop at 'Co-op' shps.

The Co-op is best known for selling groceries, funerals and insurance but in the last few decades its other financial services interests have increased quite dramatically.

The Co-operative Bank should be able to use its newly acquired branches as a springboard to turn itself into a major player in the British banking market, possible even making inroads into business banking, which has been poorly served in recent years.

Things get worse for the other banks

Three weeks ago I decided that bank shares would no longer be on my list of acceptable places to invest new money.

The final straw was the revelation that Barclays (LSE: BARC) had been manipulating the London Interbank Offered Rate (Libor), even though this appears to have been done with the tacit approval of the Bank of England.

Since then, the banking news has become worse, with HSBC Holdings (LSE: HSBA) having admitted its role in laundering money for drug cartels, terrorists and rogue states.

With the modern banking industry seemingly having gone out of its way to actively recruit sociopaths, Barclays and HSBC won't be the only ones to have broken the law.

It used to be the case that lawyers, traffic wardens and estate agents were the most despised of professions. But nowadays the investment bankers are giving them a good run for their money.

Not as ethical as you might think

However, the Co-operative isn't quite as squeaky clean as its ethical image suggests. For example, many of its own funds own shares in companies that contravene its ethical investment policy.

They're not alone in doing this because many other ethical fund managers are happy to invest in companies they say are unethical. The Co-operative has argued on many occasions that it does so in order to get these companies to change their policies and that it is easier to do this as a shareholder.

For example, here is the most recent summary for the CIS Income With Growth Unit Trust.

Among the unit trust's ten largest holdings are British American Tobacco (LSE: BATS), Royal Dutch Shell (LSE: RDSB), which has interests in the Canadian oil sands, the exploitation of which is something the Co-operative intensely dislikes, and HSBC. Does the Co-op seriously think that it can persuade BAT to get out of the tobacco business?

That said, it's isn't too hard to argue that any company in the FTSE100 (UKX) index is unethical if you look closely enough and have very strict criteria.

Want to learn more about shares, but not sure where to start? Download our latest guide -- "What Every New Investor Needs To Know" -- it's free. The Motley Fool is helping Britain invest. Better.

Further Motley Fool investment opportunities:

> Tony owns shares in Lloyds Banking Group but he doesn't own shares in any of the other companies mentioned in this article. Unlike many ethical investors he won't invest in tobacco companies

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

NorthAthenian 24 Jul 2012 , 11:03am

Shareholders in Lloyds TSB - the original pre-2008 - should be steaming and rightly so. The original Lloyds was a well-run bank that had largely avoided the sub-prime debacle and its ramifications. It then allowed itself to be 'persuaded' (by you-know-who) to take over the failing HBOS with the incentive that this was a one-off chance of a merger that would otherwise fall foul of competition law but would be waved through on this one-off occasion.

We know the rest of the sorry tale. Lack of time prevented lack of due diligence and HBOS's commercial loan book was far worse than expected. The new Lloyds banking was duly bailed out with immense destruction of shareholder value. Finally, now even the sweetener has turned sour. You couldn't make it up.

In the words from Albert and the Lion "Somebody had to be summonsed"

How they laughed.....

ANuvver 24 Jul 2012 , 4:04pm

You've 'eard 'ow young Lloyds the banker,
Were offered a rival to buy,
The name of the target were HBOS,
Wi' mortgages piled sky-high.

But what about t'monopoly people?
Enquired young Lloyds with suspicion,
Brown said: not to worry, young feller,
I'll handle t'competition commission.

Lloyds were sorry as soon he'd done it,
as HBOS's books seemed like farce,
After whacking great bailout for t'sake of the nation,
Shareholders got kicked up the...

Then up spoke the burghers of Brussels:
"Sell ze braunches!" they ordered - that blew it,
So government chose nice nice young man from the Coop,
And said: "lend 'im the money to do it."

Clitheroekid 24 Jul 2012 , 7:03pm

ANuvver

Excellent! It's a shame you can't give recs on here, as that's well worthy of a few.

Join the conversation

Please take note - some tags have changed.

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: [b]bolded text[/b], [i]italicised text[/i]. All other tags will be removed from your post.

If you want to add a link, please ensure you type it as http://www.fool.co.uk as opposed to www.fool.co.uk.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.